Current:Home > InvestKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -Financial Clarity Guides
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-14 15:42:19
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (55966)
Related
- Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
- The Year in Climate Photos
- Where Are Interest Rates Going?
- How Princess Diana's Fashion Has Stood the Test of Time
- Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
- A South Florida man shot at 2 Instacart delivery workers who went to the wrong house
- EPA Opens Civil Rights Investigation Into Louisiana’s ‘Cancer Alley’
- DC Young Fly Shares How He Cries All the Time Over Jacky Oh's Death
- 'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
- Facebook users can apply for their portion of a $725 million lawsuit settlement
Ranking
- Intel's stock did something it hasn't done since 2022
- Nuclear Energy Industry Angles for Bigger Role in Washington State and US as Climate Change Accelerates
- Dollar v. world / Taylor Swift v. FTX / Fox v. Dominion
- BuzzFeed shutters its newsroom as the company undergoes layoffs
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- A magazine touted Michael Schumacher's first interview in years. It was actually AI
- 10 Trendy Amazon Jewelry Finds You'll Want to Wear All the Time
- 'Let's Get It On' ... in court
Recommendation
Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
YouTuber Colleen Ballinger’s Ex-Husband Speaks Out After She Denies Grooming Claims
Hailey Bieber Responds to Criticism She's Not Enough of a Nepo Baby
The ‘State of the Air’ in America Is Unhealthy and Getting Worse, Especially for People of Color
Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
Bethany Hamilton Welcomes Baby No. 4, Her First Daughter
Noah Cyrus Shares How Haters Criticizing Her Engagement Reminds Her of Being Suicidal at Age 11
‘Delay is Death,’ said UN Chief António Guterres of the New IPCC Report Showing Climate Impacts Are Outpacing Adaptation Efforts