Current:Home > reviewsThe Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the Constitution -Financial Clarity Guides
The Supreme Court will decide if state laws limiting social media platforms violate the Constitution
View
Date:2025-04-27 14:10:32
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether state laws that seek to regulate Facebook, TikTok, X and other social media platforms violate the Constitution.
The justices will review laws enacted by Republican-dominated legislatures and signed by Republican governors in Florida and Texas. While the details vary, both laws aim to prevent the social media companies from censoring users based on their viewpoints.
The court’s announcement, three days before the start of its new term, comes as the justices continue to grapple with how laws written at the dawn of the digital age, or earlier, apply to the online world.
The justices had already agreed to decide whether public officials can block critics from commenting on their social media accounts, an issue that previously came up in a case involving then-President Donald Trump. The court dismissed the Trump case when his presidential term ended in January 2021.
Separately, the high court also could consider a lower-court order limiting executive branch officials’ communications with social media companies about controversial online posts.
The new case follows conflicting rulings by two appeals courts, one of which upheld the Texas law, while the other struck down Florida’s statute. By a 5-4 vote, the justices kept the Texas law on hold while litigation over it continues.
But the alignment was unusual. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett voted to grant the emergency request from two technology industry groups that challenged the law in federal court.
Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan and Neil Gorsuch would have allowed the law to remain in effect. In dissent, Alito wrote, “Social media platforms have transformed the way people communicate with each other and obtain news.”
Proponents of the laws, including Republican elected officials in several states that have similar measures, have sought to portray social media companies as generally liberal in outlook and hostile to ideas outside of that viewpoint, especially from the political right.
The tech sector warned that the laws would prevent platforms from removing extremism and hate speech.
Without offering any explanation, the justices had put off consideration of the case even though both sides agreed the high court should step in.
The justices had other social media issues before them last year, including a plea the court did not embrace to soften legal protections tech companies have for posts by their users.
veryGood! (4)
Related
- This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
- Judge rejects Justice Department's request to pause order limiting Biden administration's contact with social media companies
- As Coal Declined, This Valley Turned to Sustainable Farming. Now Fracking Threatens Its Future.
- Maine lobster industry wins reprieve but environmentalists say whales will die
- Backstage at New York's Jingle Ball with Jimmy Fallon, 'Queer Eye' and Meghan Trainor
- Meta's Mark Zuckerberg says Threads has passed 100 million signups in 5 days
- Christy Turlington’s 19-Year-Old Daughter Grace Burns Makes Runway Debut in Italy
- Ukraine's Elina Svitolina missed a Harry Styles show to play Wimbledon. Now, Styles has an invitation for her.
- Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
- Police Officer Catches Suspected Kidnapper After Chance Encounter at Traffic Stop
Ranking
- See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
- Indiana Bill Would Make it Harder to Close Coal Plants
- Kim Kardashian Proves Her Heart Points North West With Sweet 10th Birthday Tribute
- Inside Clean Energy: Tesla Gets Ever So Close to 400 Miles of Range
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Analysts Worried the Pandemic Would Stifle Climate Action from Banks. It Did the Opposite.
- Minimum wage just increased in 23 states and D.C. Here's how much
- 3 reasons why Seattle schools are suing Big Tech over a youth mental health crisis
Recommendation
Buckingham Palace staff under investigation for 'bar brawl'
Pete Davidson Charged With Reckless Driving for Crashing Into Beverly Hills House
Camp Pendleton Marine raped girl, 14, in barracks, her family claims
The RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars Cast Reveals Makeup Hacks Worthy of a Crown
Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
Vacation rental market shift leaves owners in nerve-wracking situation as popular areas remain unbooked
Belarusian Victoria Azarenka says it was unfair to be booed at Wimbledon after match with Ukrainian Elina Svitolina
Sony says its PlayStation 5 shortage is finally over, but it's still hard to buy
Like
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- Ukraine's Elina Svitolina missed a Harry Styles show to play Wimbledon. Now, Styles has an invitation for her.
- This Frizz-Reducing, Humidity-Proofing Spray Is a Game-Changer for Hair and It Has 39,600+ 5-Star Reviews